Vailton Renato wrote:
Vialton, I do not understand you on this. I've not uploaded the newer
application, are you referring to the text document files themselves?
Yes! As the updates are constant, would be a field $revision$ to
whether the documentation in text format is outdated or not. And I
believe that the name of the source file would be useful to be able to
see quickly if something was changed or not.
I think we can can continue this conversation later. Some docs are
embedded within source files so the $id$ value cannot be used, though
that could indicate that source has changed.
I admit I am not following your train of thought at this time, but it
has been a long day.
The first steps are to cleanup the source files and ensure that the
output is clean.
April
--
Being perfect isn't as easy as I make it look
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
