Yes, probably that's why it was copied to hbct, but if we
have in core full time with the same name (which we do
since yesterday), there is no need to have it in hbct, nor
in xpp.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2009.06.18., at 12:07, Mike Evans (Gmail) wrote:
I think that StoD() function is supported even under clipper 5.2
through CT lib.
Brgds
Mike Evans
-----Original Message-----
From: harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org [mailto:harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org
] On Behalf Of Przemyslaw Czerpak
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 12:52 AM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11403] trunk/
harbour
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, vszak...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
; TODO: Decide about the status of STOD() function, which is
currently an XPP compatibility function, not in Harbour
namespace, yet it's widely used with same functionality.
IMO covering it by HB_COMPAT_XPP was wrong and confusing.
STOD() function is much older then XBASE++. It's supported by nearly
all dbase compatible compilers so it should be default part of
Harbour.
If necessary excluded by HB_C52_STRICT. For sure it has nothing to
XBASE++
best regards,
Przemek
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
