Horodyski Marek (PZUZ) escreveu:
Yes, therefore I write "without additive rules".
Regards,
Marek Horodyski
-----Original Message-----
From: Vailton Renato [mailto:vail...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 10:06 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] exit with switch and for each
Here I use something like this:
lExit := .F.
for each x in stringORarray
switch x
case 'a'
lExit := .T.
exit // but we need exit from "for each", not only from
switch end if lExit
exit;
end
next
Hi, the are many ways for this, but IMO, the worst is adding such
extension to language!
Please, keep simple, and make all happy.
How much "features" like this, more slow and bugged will be the language.
Please, don´t force your language.
Best regards,
Ranier Vilela
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
