I suggest to gather these misc parts until we have more than one such addons
and we can see a bit better what we
are dealing with exactly. An 'addon' scheme needs some
planning IMO before we commit things to the SVN.

I see we're running in too many directions already with QT
related things.

I feel an alternate Alert() is a perfect part of GTQTG, but I
cannot see a place for it in other places with this name.
With a different name, it can be a start for a higher level QT
layer, similar (in fact an alternative) to hbxbp, but it's too
early to form a concept based on one function ;)

Brgds,
Viktor

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Pritpal Bedi <bediprit...@hotmail.com>wrote:

>
> Hello Everybody
>
> I propose to setup
> harbour/contrib/hbqtadd ( or with better name )
> which will compile to hbqtadd.lib
>
> OBJECTIVE
> ========
> To accuulate all standalone widgets which can be used in
> end user applications, just like Renauto's Alert() he
> posted a few messages back.
>
> RULES
> ====
> 1. The function must adhere to Harbour coding and formatting styles.
> 2. The function must use either QT's API on C level or hbqt.lib on PRG
> level.
> 3. The function must pe prefixed by "QTA_" ( or better name ) [ QTA_Alert()
> ].
> 4. All other supporting functions must be file-wide statics.
> 5. The function just receive PRG level parameters and return a value, if
> needed.
>
> This way we will have a wealth of functions to integrate with base
> GTQTC | GTQTG | HBQTXBP when those will be ready.
>
> If accepted please post first contribution by Renauto to this lib.
>
> Regards
> Pritpal Bedi
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/QT---Add-On-Library-tp23065307p23065307.html
> Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Harbour mailing list
> Harbour@harbour-project.org
> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
>
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to