Me too.
Viktor Szakáts wrote: > > I also opt for clean code. If compatibility is such concern we should find > some optional compatibility layer. Maybe cleaner OLE implementation > will result in more robust app/3rd party lib code, too, which is always > a good thing. > But the question is what is that "comatibility layer"? This does not mean that you have to have "cleaner code" in comparison to "working code". Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/error-in-hbwin-ole-with-msvc-tp22650849p22953256.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour