Me too.

Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> 
> I also opt for clean code. If compatibility is such concern we should find
> some optional compatibility layer. Maybe cleaner OLE implementation
> will result in more robust app/3rd party lib code, too, which is always
> a good thing.
> 

But the question is what is that "comatibility layer"?
This does not mean that you have to have "cleaner code"
in comparison to "working code".

Regards
Pritpal Bedi

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/error-in-hbwin-ole-with-msvc-tp22650849p22953256.html
Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to