> > * config/win/bcc.cf > * -4 -> -6 for Pentium Pro instructions. Looking at the generated > code this looks like rescheduling, if someone now can test Harbour > or plain Pentium, it would be good to know if it still works. >
Some more info on above: Turns out that -6 generates the *exact same* code as -4, with both 5.5 and 5.8. Quite interesting, but true. I did some tests using -5 also, and it turned out to be significantly slower than -4/-6. So, the quick conclusion is that we should stick with -4 or -6. Please comment or make some locals test to deny or confirm these findings. Brgds, Viktor
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
