i was searched in demoxbp XBPStatic instead wvgStatic oStatic := WvgStatic():new( oDA ) oStatic:type := WVGSTATIC_TYPE_TEXT oStatic:options := WVGSTATIC_TEXT_CENTER oStatic:caption := chr(13)+'Implemented Xbase++ Parts'
I think that in demoxbp will better having #translate xbpStatic > WvgStatic and use in demoxbp the know xbpStatic In future translation will be easy adapted to other lib and sound ok for xbase++ user I am very intrested by idea of having gt with gui capability independant of operating systems. I hope that will be able to switch from GTWVG to GTQTG whitout rewrite 2009/3/30 Pritpal Bedi <bediprit...@hotmail.com>: > > Hi > >>I agree with qt prioriry > > :-) > >>XBase++ Parts by gtwvg have XBPStatics (not present in demoxbp) ? > > Are you sure? Did you examine demoxbp.prg ? > >>Do you still plan support gtwvg ? > > 100%. > >>What are GTQTC and GTQTG ? > > Console and GUI based terminals just like GTWVT and GTWVG > but independant of operating systems. > > > Regards > Pritpal Bedi > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Harbour-Distribution---Ready-to-Use-tp22326050p22788909.html > Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > Harbour@harbour-project.org > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > -- Massimo Belgrano _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
