It's correctly detected, but could be made more accurate by using some additional techniques to distinguish between Server 2003 and XP x64. The same version number is returned for both of these OSes by MS, which is a bit misleading.
-- Viktor On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Francesco Saverio Giudice < i...@fsgiudice.com> wrote: > Hi Chen, > > Il 30/03/2009 7.10, Chen Kedem ha scritto: > >> Angel Pais wrote: >> >>> Performance went to the sky ! >>> Scalability not so much... >>> >> : >> >>> 03/29/09 17:58:22 Windows Server 2003 / XP x64 5.2.3790 >>> Harbour 1.1.0dev (Rev. 10726) (MT)+ Microsoft Visual C++ 14.0.24999 >>> (32-bit) >>> >> >> It looks like Windows 64-bit version and 32-bit executable. Can it effect >> the results? >> >> No, O.S. it is not correctly detected, in mine case, but I think also in > Angel case, is Windows 2003 Server 32 bit. I have to fix OS detection. > > Best regards, > Francesco > >
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
