On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:

Hi,

> > more efficient to compile windows Harbour builds with -DHB_FM_WIN_ALLOC.
> Shouldn't we make this the default for hbvmmt lib?

Probably yes though it would be good to check the results with different
installations (single and multicpu machines, XP vs VISTA, etc.)
The memory manager for MT mode can be quite easy improved with the cost
of total amount of used memory, f.e. we can use the same trick as in
nedmalloc and allocate for each thread private mspace or some cached
memory pool.
Probably I'll return to this subject in the future but now I want to
keep all things as simple as possible.

best regards,
Przemek
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to