Hi Przemek & Viktor,
Is this a confirmed bug ?
Thanks,
Ed
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
> Seems like a valid problem. Anyone with a suggestion?
> Brgds,
> Viktor
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 6:21 PM, AbeB <abe.b...@att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> dbskip(0) will move the record pointer to phantom record (honoring the
>> scope). other RDDS don't do that
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------
>> #include "ads.ch"
>>
>> proc main()
>>
>> rddregister( "ADS", 1 )
>> rddsetdefault( "ADSCDX" )
>> set server local
>> adslocking( .f. )
>> adssetfiletype(ADS_CDX)
>> adslocking( .f. )
>>
>> dbcreate("test.dbf",{ ;
>> {"tick" ,"n" , 10,0} })
>>
>> use test via "ADSCDX" excl
>> index on tick tag tick
>>
>> ordscope(0, 100)
>> ordscope(1, 200 )
>>
>> ? rddname()
>>
>> for lop := 1 to 10
>>
>>
>> dbappend( .t. )
>>
>> //refresh buffer (server's trigger populated some fields)
>>
>> dbskip( 0 )
>>
>> //goto recn() //<----- this is ok
>>
>> field->tick := 100 + lop
>>
>> ? field->tick ,eof()
>>
>> next
>>
>> browse() // looks like a corrupted index file , try browsing
>> *******************
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n2.nabble.com/nasty-bug%3A-in-RDDADS-%2B-scopeactive-%2B-dbskip%280%29-tp2445184p2445184.html
>> Sent from the harbour-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Harbour mailing list
>> Harbour@harbour-project.org
>> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Harbour mailing list
> Harbour@harbour-project.org
> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/nasty-bug%3A-in-RDDADS-%2B-scopeactive-%2B-dbskip%280%29-tp22400367p22587826.html
Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
