>
> > Sorry, I don't understand you.
> > xhgtk uses several subdirs to store different part of the interface,
> > and these subdirs generate one unified library. This doesn't seem
> > possible with our current GNU-make system.
>
> I have integrated xhgtk in the contrib using "standard" makefiles and
> so generating one lib for every dir.


Yes, after all this isn't the end of the world. With
consistently naming the related libs, it can be just as good.

Even the dependencies are easier to handle with the
approach.


> AFAIK Marcos is also one of the xhgtk developers.
>
> I will be interested to know his plans for xhgtk and hbqt.


[Me too.]

Brgds,
Viktor
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to