Hi Viktor

I agree with whole concept.
Let us do it right, right now. Only pointers,
no numeric handles at all. Basically, if we have 
to use existing code too, we will be changing the
function calls and there stays the whole effort.

So, it should be like:
   #define wapi_par_HWND( n ) ( ( HWND ) ( HB_PTRDIFF ) hb_parptr( n ) )
   just to avoid the cost of - ( ISNUM( n ) ? ( HB_PTRDIFF ) hb_parnint( n )
: hb_parptr( n ) )
OR 
   the flexible way is better in the long run?

BTW, this artical is really thought provoking.

Regards
Pritpal Bedi


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/SF.net-SVN%3A-harbour-project%3A-10273--trunk-harbour-tp22017357p22018462.html
Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to