Viktor Szakáts escribió:
Please function TTOS is necessary to fully support cdx indexes of
last version of dbf (implemented in vfp). Please don't add hb_ prefix
in this case, please don't add it.
You know we have a rule to add it for all Harbour extension
functions.
Depending on where TTOS() comes from, we may implement
it in xhb.lib, or add it to core with HB_COMPAT_FOXPRO
protection.
At this point we haven't even decided that HB_TTOS() will or
will not be compatible with TTOS() (I don't know the details of
TTOS()).
can do whatever you want, but if you want 100% support harbor index cdx, TTOS must exist to support them, not just visual fox
pro, advantage also uses it for example.
Why we need HB_TTOS() and TTOS() at the same time.
I think TTOS is the best solution with HB_COMPAT_FOXPRO and without it.
Best regards,
Miguel Angel Marchuet
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
