Przemyslaw Czerpak escribió:
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009, Miguel Angel Marchuet wrote:
Hi Miguel,
(Foxpro) Code page: These values follow the DOS / Windows Code Page values.
Value Description Code page
01h DOS USA code page 437
02h DOS Multilingual code page 850
03h Windows ANSI code page 1252
04h Standard Macintosh
64h EE MS-DOS code page 852
65h Nordic MS-DOS code page 865
66h Russian MS-DOS code page 866
67h Icelandic MS-DOS
68h Kamenicky (Czech) MS-DOS
69h Mazovia (Polish) MS-DOS
6Ah Greek MS-DOS (437G)
6Bh Turkish MS-DOS
96h Russian Macintosh
97h Eastern European Macintosh
98h Greek Macintosh
C8h Windows EE code page 1250
C9h Russian Windows
CAh Turkish Windows
CBh Greek Windows
this is full table supporte for old foxpro not vfp ( see below for vfp)
This are all codepages supported by vfp:
Code page Platform Code page identifier
437 U.S. MS-DOS x01
620 * Mazovia (Polish) MS-DOS x69
737 * Greek MS-DOS (437G) x6A
850 International MS-DOS x02
852 Eastern European MS-DOS x64
857 Turkish MS-DOS x6B
861 Icelandic MS-DOS x67
865 Nordic MS-DOS x66
866 Russian MS-DOS x65
874 Thai Windows x7C
895 * Kamenicky (Czech) MS-DOS x68
932 Japanese Windows x7B
936 Chinese (PRC, Singapore) Windows x7A
949 Korean Windows x79
950 Chinese (Hong Kong SAR, Taiwan) Windows x78
1250 Eastern European Windows xC8
1251 Russian Windows xC9
1252 Windows ANSI x03
1253 Greek Windows xCB
1254 Turkish Windows xCA
1255 Hebrew Windows x7D
1256 Arabic Windows x7E
10000 Standard Macintosh x04
10006 Greek Macintosh x98
10007 * Russian Macintosh x96
10029 Macintosh EE x97
* Not detected when you include CODEPAGE=AUTO in your configuration file.
Looks that VFP uses the same table with few new entries:
78h Chinese (Hong Kong SAR, Taiwan) Windows (950)
79h Korean Windows (949)
8Ah Chinese (PRC, Singapore) Windows (936)
7Bh Japanese Windows (932)
7Ch Thai Windows (874)
7Dh Hebrew Windows (1255)
7Eh Arabic Windows (1256)
I guess that misplaced numbers for:
65h Nordic MS-DOS code page 865
66h Russian MS-DOS code page 866
is a typo and only one of the above versions is correct (FP or VFP)
this codes are for old foxpro dbf not for current vfp
OK but VFP uses the same table with few new entries.
I think the VFP table, is more reliable than foxpro table.
we can implement this one.
thks, i found one problem, when users of ourxdbu try to write code
using BlobImport, macro evaluator not found this function :(, I think
can be good idea to add synonim fo DbFileGet and DbFilePut too as
BlobImport, BlobExport and others to help macroevaluator to solve this
type of code, of course i can say too users, that BlobImport is not a
function. :(
What do you think?
This sounds reasonable but in such case all blob*() functions should be
in separated file and not mixed with other RDD functions.
I'm agree
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
