Viktor
Viktor Szakáts wrote: > > IMO these needs to be changed in GTWVG, hbwin is the > generic lib in this case. F.e. my local framework lib uses > prefix_win_*() naming to avoid such possible collisions, > similar should be used for GTWVG and for all contribs > implementing local Windows API wrappers. > > Another (but more complicated) solution is to try to integrate > common functionality. Right now it's a pity that some > Windows API wrappers are repeated in several contribs > (hbwhat, gtwvg, hbole, hbwin). It's mess and we should > try to reduce it. We have at least 3 OLE/ActiveX > implementations for example (and none of them fully > developed/tested/maintained). > I agree with your viewpoint but at the moment, or until we create a common library to be used by all libs, I would like if you change WIN_ * with something else. Perhaps I cannot change my whole code as I use hbwin.lib also. Note GTWVG came into existance much prior to HBWIN. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SF.net-SVN%3A-harbour-project%3A-10164--trunk-harbour-tp21821360p21822162.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
