2009/2/3 Viktor Szakáts <harbour...@syenar.hu> > We can make such recommendation, or even better > give a priority list of compilers / platforms supported > by Harbour. I've posted one such possible priority at > around release 1.0. This way we may gently shift > focus on the long run. Wich is your prefered list today? Can be made same works for give speed to a particular compiler and write "Optimized for mingw" (only for example) for example resolve problem of missing high quality dlmalloc, ptmalloc allocators in mingw? This can give a direction better that more world
> The benefit is of the users' for the most part, Harbour's > benefit is some potential quality image gain, by > picking and supporting good quality, standard external > tools. Tools for adeveloper will be are ide and a library Wich are your suggestion for windows/harbour? > From a development POV, all this doesn't really matter, > as it's highly unlikely that support for any of the widely > used compilers would suddenly be dropped. This wouldn't > make any sense anyway, since this is an OSS project. Sorry for my ingorance What is oss? _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
