Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: > > yes, it could be also insufficient environment size. > Now you have similar problems to the ones I have in DOS. > It does not GPF but it begins to make some unpredictable > things. Looks that it loses some of settings like current > directory or make does not clean some settings when leave > directory increasing environment size or internal current > path setting.
I've looked up this issue, it has 32Kb of environment size, I can try to reduce path/dpath/help and so on environment variables to see if it builds again, but, for the long term, it could be better to find what is using this memory and remove/change it. > Non *nix GNU make builds makes some strange things to emulate > POSIX environment and this can be side effect of them. > Seems that for DOS and OS2 we should use the old code. It also > allow parallel execution with recent modifications but is not > such efficient because only one directory (lib) can be compiled > in the same time so only the files inside single dir are compiled > simultaneously. I think that parallel compilation is a nice plus but I've lived so many years without it that I really don't know how much it is worth on OS/2 which is no more a mainstream OS. Thanks. Maurilio. -- __________ | | | |__| Maurilio Longo |_|_|_|____| farmaconsult s.r.l. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
