On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor,
> Two links that may be useful sometimes: > stdint.h implemented for MSVC compilers: > http://msinttypes.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/stdint.h > > Portable stdint.h implementation: > http://www.azillionmonkeys.com/qed/pstdint.h Thanks for the links. I do not want to implement our ownIEEE754 double value decoding. The only one place I made it is common/hbarch.c because I need it for binary compatibility in some places like CDX format or PCODE in .hrb modules used on different platforms. Here we have platform native double values so insteadof decoding them manually I strongly prefer to use compiler functions. These are very simple functions (often macros) and most compilers supports them. If not then nothing very wrong will happen. Just simply we will not show +/-INF value but NaN instead. We do not have it in our code so it's not vital functionality for us. For [u]intmax_t we can use [U]LONGLONG as replacement. Not good but will work for current compilers. It's only important to add support for stdint.h for all possible compilers checking their version if necessary. It should help in the future if some compilers support bigger then 64bit integers so [u]intmax_t will be declared correctly. Now if possible and necessary then please update hbprintf.c for MSVC. It's the last popular compiler I haven't tested. We should also make some tests with different *nixes. Anyhow current hb_snprintf_c() code seems to be ready to replace our snprintf() wrapper (hb_snprintf()). best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
