On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Francesco Saverio Giudice < i...@fsgiudice.com> wrote:
> Hi Viktor, > > Il 14/01/2009 23.34, Francesco Saverio Giudice ha scritto: > >> >> and what about a single hbusrdds.lib or hbudds.lib that contains all >> together, see that all are small prg files ? >> > For a kick start it's a good idea to create one monolithic lib. This makes it possible to clean, debug and use them instantly. On the longer run I'd personally prefer them separate. Otherwise it makes them look like one monolithic lib, which they really aren't. Similar logic is already implemented for rddsql, where we have sdd* libs as "plugins". For the monolithic name, I'd suggest 'hbuddall' (or 'hbudds, but the single 's' can mean 'static' and other things, so it's a bit ambigous), and later we can still move to 'udd*'. Brgds, Viktor
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
