On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Lorenzo Fiorini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which is the best option? I'll answer to myself: after hours of tests the best option is the number 1. It's the only clean option that allow to correctly manage build, clean and install targets. I've left the names as they are for the moment to easy the diff with the upstream project. However I think it'll be good for the upstream also to rename them all lowercase and compile prg using -w3. best regards, Lorenzo _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
