Hi Viktor, On 2008/11/19 Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All my questions were aimed towards a binary distribution. > F.e. our current 1.0.1 for OSX package on sf.net download > page. > > [ I know these can be controlled when building from source > and running 'make install', this is exactly how it's working > here locally on OS X, Linux and Windows. ] > > For the rest: why would I have to modify an environment > to run a simple executable? > > It's very easy to avoid and very unnatural, so why > make it so complicated and not work "out of the box"? > Well, then I'd guess that the rpath should be embedded into the harbour executable and the executables generated by it. Adding "--rpath=<your desired path>" (or maybe "-Wl,rpath,<your desired path>", not tested) to the gcc command line should do the trick and save you of having to specify LD_RUN_PATH each time. This is an obscure (for me, at least) feature of gcc, and I could very well be wrong, and I shiver at the idea of adding the current directory to the run path. But if this is in the line of what you want, it could be worth to investigate. If this is not in the line of what you want, I'm afraid I completely missed your point :-) And one final caveat: this works in linux (and in Solaris, AFAIR) I don't have a clue whether it will work at all in OSX. HTH. Best regards, -- Lost _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
