> It would be good to see MT results
Harbour 1.1.0dev (Rev. 9523) (MT), Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 ============================================================ total application time: 62.95 total real time: 64.50 Harbour 1.1.0dev (Rev. 9523) (MT), Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 + winhoard ============================================================ total application time: 63.05 total real time: 64.92 Maybe someone can test with Linux also.. > there is one showstopper Yes I know about it. But one advantage - it's can use with old version Harbour and even xHarbour (but it not our problem). Also here http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/nedmalloc/nedmalloc_v105_svn1078.zip?download http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/nedmalloc/nedmalloc_v105_svn1078.zip I found dlmalloc V2.8.4 V2.8.4 (not yet released) * Add mspace_mmap_large_chunks; thanks to Jean Brouwers * Fix insufficient sys_alloc padding when using 16byte alignment * Fix bad error check in mspace_footprint * Adaptations for ptmalloc, courtesy of Wolfram Gloger. * Reentrant spin locks, courtesy of Earl Chew and others * Win32 improvements, courtesy of Niall Douglas and Earl Chew * Add NO_SEGMENT_TRAVERSAL and MAX_RELEASE_CHECK_RATE options * Extension hook in malloc_state * Various small adjustments to reduce warnings on some compilers * Various configuration extensions/changes for more platforms. Thanks to all who contributed these. Maybe it's can be helpful for Harbour. Regards, Petr -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Yet-another-memory-allocator--tp19749208p19750288.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
