Hi Przemek, all, it probably is not that important, but this might be an explanation:
In the xbase++ forums, you can often see people writing about "harbour", but what they mean is the commercial release of xHarbour. And the latter IS a competitor to xbase++... And I do not know how much the concept of free software (free as in free speech) has been discussed in their community. Free software where it is perfectly allowed to have & keep & copy the source code, to fork a project, ... isn't that great (I'm serious!)? Having said that: Keep up your superb work, guys! Congrats to 1.0.x!! And thank you for releasing your great work as free software! -Martin Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Pritpal Bedi wrote: > > Hi Pritpal, > >>> why should I as a Xbase++ developer help a competitor to advance its >>> product??? >>> And why do you ask for our help in the Xbase++ generic newsgroup? In my >> Please do not understand me wrong. > > Sorry, I was wrong. I hope that you asked xbase++ authors but > you addressed your question to xbase++ users. I'm surprised with > their reaction. > They should be interesting in working alternatives for xbase++. > Now I do not understand it. Let's return to Harbour problems. > > best regards, > Przemek > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > Harbour@harbour-project.org > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour