On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Finally I tested cross build version of MinGW-3.4.5 and I'm very > surprised with the results: > ST: 22.35 > MT: 31.69 > The ST code is faster then native linux code. I noticed that programs > executed by WINE runs fater on real multi CPU machine but I haven't > expected anything like that. > The MT overhead is 41.79%. > This MinGW version does not have native TLS support so I create asm > inline function based on the one created for BCC by Mindaugas and it > reduced the MT speedtst time to 28.88 sec. (overhead 29.22%). > I'll commit both inline asm functions to SF repository in a while > and I would like to ask BCC and MinGW users to make speed tests for > MT mode for Harbour compiled with and without -DHB_NO_TLS macro. > It will be the answer if it's worth to keep them or not. I've also found that the official 3.4.5 is faster than 4.3.2 tdm unofficial even in a native Win ( W2Ksp4 under VirtualBox VM ). best regards, Lorenzo _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
