I can understand the feelings of Jan to be honest.
I have no idea what kind of newsgroup is where you've
posted this message, but if XBase++ developers frequent
it, this can easily be taken as offense and the result
is kinda predictable.
Set aside the above, I think we have enough expertise
and available information (maybe even working copies
of XBase++ for testing) to be able to polish the MT
support to have the best available solution, be it fully
or partially XBase++ compatible.
So I think it's up to us local XBase++ users to make
anything like the above happen. [ I'm no XBase++ user BTW. ]
So far though, no test results were posted on Przemek's
request, which makes it look like we don't even care
that much.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.09.25., at 23:22, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
Hi
And I got this reply:
****************************************
Pritpal,
why should I as a Xbase++ developer help a competitor to advance its
product???
And why do you ask for our help in the Xbase++ generic newsgroup? In
my
eyes this is trolling. This has nothing to do with Xbase++.
Maybe you should visit the thread started by Massimo in the soapbox
newsgroup. This will help you to understand how Xbase++ developers
think
about this.
Maybe in future times I and others should start some interesting
threads
in the Harbour groups about the great new enhancements within Xbase++?
Lets see how other harbour developers react to this!
Jan
****************************************
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/A-few-questions-about-MT-tp19555409p19678591.html
Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
