I agree on library merge If we adopt a standard make will be minus important library merge because the make But without a standard make we can more easy to use Is Possible give either monolithic and parcelized?
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Szakáts Viktor Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 12:23 PM To: Harbour Project Main Developer List. Subject: Re: [Harbour] what is changed from clipper.lib and extend.lib inlibrary structure I'd agree on a lib merge, but last time we've tried it looked like something against the various needs ppl seem to be having. Maybe hbmacro, hblang, hbcpage, hbrdd could be merged into hbrtl without concerns. This would be a small step to this direction. We'd definitely need opinions and an agreement on it and also helping hands who can do this merge. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
