On Sat, 20 Sep 2008, Andi Jahja wrote: Hi Andi,
> And this is the reply from xHarbour expert: > > Absolutely right. Today Przemek has committed exactly same behaviour as of > > Xbase++ > > **************************** > > 2008-09-20 00:42 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) > > + harbour/source/rdd/wadetach.c > > + added .prg functions: > > hb_waDetach( [<nWorkArea>|<cAlias>], [<xCargo>] ) -> <lSuccess> > > hb_waRequest( [<cAlias>], [<lFreeArea>], [<@xCargo>], [<lWait>] ) > > -> <lSuccess> > > The first one detach workarea from current thread and move it > > to special hidden holder. Before detaching all relations (parent > > and child) to detached workarea are cleared. > > The second one restores area from the holder and attach it > > to calling thread. > > + added xBase++ compatible functions DbRelease() / DbRequest() > > xBase++ users please test. If possible please also check what xBase++ > > does with relations and active RLOCKs/FLOCK on released WA. > > **************************** > This has nothing to do with MT... The above is enough to not make any other comments. It will be waste of time. best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
