We will be having (and we already have) other
differences, too, and even these current function
name may change and/or get extended, new ones added,
so I think this would just create false impressions
in 1.0.1. We should remember that MT is not yet
mature in trunk.
For speedtst and memtst conditional code can easily
be added to make them compile in 1.0.1, and if this
is done, I can even sync back these two tests to 1.0
branch.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.09.17., at 8:02, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
I tried to test new memtst and speedtst with 1.0.1 to check the
differences with 1.1.0 but the last uses the func HB_MTVM() which is
defined in source/vm/threads.c.
IMHO it would useful to add "stubbed" thread functions to 1.0.1 so
that one can start to add MT code to real apps without requiring to
jump in production with 1.1.0 too early.
Clearly if we think that 1.1.0 will be released soon, it is less
important.
best regards,
Lorenzo
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
