Hi Lorenzo,

I do need still hbglib2.0-dev though, right?

Yes, glib is the "foundation" for gtk is normal to have both.

Thanks.

gtk 1.2 is quite old and unfortunately around the net there are a lot
of outdated resources.

I don't want to start a flame but my experience is that Ubuntu is
really good user oriented distro with really strong hardware support.
However RedHat has key developers in gcc, Linux kernel, xorg, gnome,
gtk, Java, OpenOffice and many other projects, and is used as
development distro by PS3, IBM and Eclipse teams.
This is reflected in the quality of the development tools that you
find in RHEL, Fedora, Centos.

For me RedHat "lost" it when it got split between the
above, I can't really see or tell the difference, so I
have no idea which one would fit me the best. I've found
Debian more clear, and more consistently recommended around
those how deal with this more deeply. But all this is more
of a subjective thing and it's not even based on too much
first hand experience or deep knowledge.

So we can say my preference in Linux distros is pretty light
and I could hardly go to a flame war for any one of them :)

Maybe later I will give a try with a RedHat based distro.
The big question is still: with which one?

[ BTW, I once was a RedHat "user", meaning my small
experimental home server was running it for years. It
was the RedHat 6-7-8 era. With as painful update process
as it can be. ]

Brgds,
Viktor

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to