On Tue, 05 Aug 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor,
> The size is a problem for all non-Unix builds currently, so it > would be good to deal with it. Even if a .dll based build is > technically possible in Windows, I think one of the strengths of > hbdot/hbrun, that they are self-contained, easy to run just by > having the .exe. Also the functionality of hbrun/hbdot is so > much overlapped that it might be better to have them as one > utility anyway. At least IMO. Probably in non *nix environment yes. > Regardless of the merge, all you write can just make everything > even better. OK, I'll add hbextern library and include it to GNU make builds. For sure it will be cleaner for users. Now without checking harbour source code with all internal dependences it's not possible to guess which functions not used explicitly are visible in Harbour shared binaries. > If there are no objections, I'll replace current hbrun code > with hbdot code, and remove hbdot. OK, I please do that. I can update RPMs and man files adding hbextern library. best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
