Hi Przemek,
2) BCC58 old one:
Warning W8017 C:\devl\BCC58\Include\stdint.h 77: Redefinition of
'INT16_MIN' is not identical
Warning W8017 C:\devl\BCC58\Include\stdint.h 78: Redefinition of
'INT32_MIN' is not identical
Warning W8017 C:\devl\BCC58\Include\stdint.h 79: Redefinition of
'INT64_MIN' is not identical
Warning W8017 C:\devl\BCC58\Include\stdint.h 82: Redefinition of
'INT16_MAX' is not identical
Warning W8017 C:\devl\BCC58\Include\stdint.h 83: Redefinition of
'INT32_MAX' is not identical
Warning W8017 C:\devl\BCC58\Include\stdint.h 84: Redefinition of
'INT64_MAX' is not identical
Warning W8017 C:\devl\BCC58\Include\stdint.h 87: Redefinition of
'UINT16_MAX' is not identical
Warning W8017 C:\devl\BCC58\Include\stdint.h 88: Redefinition of
'UINT32_MAX' is not identical
Warning W8017 C:\devl\BCC58\Include\stdint.h 89: Redefinition of
'UINT64_MAX' is not identical
Couldn't we use HB_ prefixed versions of *_MAX inside Harbour to
avoid the above problem?
What do you think about it? Is this nonsense?
Brgds,
Viktor
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
