On Mon, 02 Jun 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor,
> Do you have anything against making -kM and -kJ (and > the rest of switches) to work in a case-insensitive > fashion? I can only think of the lesser variations this > would us, but there would be something seriously > wrong with Harbour if we'd be needing more than 25 > such switch in the future. Let's wait with final decisions for Ryszard response. > Also, is -kh equivalent to -kix ? No, it isn't. Now you can test it yourself by harbour -kch -k? 'c' will clear all flags and 'h' will set Harbour extensions. 'i' and 'x' have separated switches. best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
