Lorenzo, is not a problem of GT question.
we lost speed here, comparing with xharbour
ao[n] := Nil
And too is a lost memory (and strange) here
ao := nil
hb_gcAll( .T. )
at the end of the test.
the results of the test was made for
#define MAXTEST 10000
using OS W2000
Best regards,
Miguel Angel Marchuet
Lorenzo Fiorini escribió:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Miguel Angel Marchuet
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
more simple test to see the problem:
Harbour looses 38.571 Bytes in 9.25 seconds
xHarbour looses 56.956 Bytes in 4.83 seconds
Why Harbour is more slow ?
Why xHarbour loose more memory ?
Why 2 compilers loose memory ?
This test reports more the speed of the GT and video susbsys than the
compilers runtime speed. F.e. on Linux and Harbour ( latest svn )
using gtstd I got:
...
Mem used -> 266072
We lost 29998 Bytes
Elapsed time 0.93
Under valgrind I got:
We lost 29998 Bytes
Elapsed time 28.01
==8873==
==8873== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 19 from 1)
==8873== malloc/free: in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
==8873== malloc/free: 602,386 allocs, 602,386 frees, 876,873,754 bytes
allocated.
==8873== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v
==8873== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible.
best regards,
Lorenzo
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
