----- Original Message ----- From: "Przemyslaw Czerpak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List." <harbour@harbour-project.org> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 1:37 PM Subject: Re: [Harbour] 2008-04-25 12:01 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak(druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
> :stabilize()). But it's also quite expensive for strongly > filtered tables. Without bitmap filters it's real performance > killer. tbrowse story, being a low level stuff for dbu.exe is very interesting story c52 dbu is almost completely unusable with longer [100k records] tables when being filtered. the worst thing is that horizontal movement, even without scroll, just from column to column, is awfully slow. on contrary, the old c87 dbu has no problem in horizontal moving, no matter how large the table is or how strongly is filtered. even, we have built advices when is the usage of old c87 dbu mandatory. looking forward for this new tbrowse/dbu _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
