I've found accidentally this message on a
http://lists.harbour-project.org/, but it's absent in my mailbox.
Przemyslaw Czerpak writes:
> Now I suggest to use HB_AT() and add to your project HB_AT() function
> for xHarbour build until xHarbour will not support it.
> #ifdef __XHARBOUR__
> HB_FUNC( HB_AT ) { HB_FUNC_EXEC( AT ); }
> #endif
This could be a decision if we had Harbour/xHarbour issue only. But
what to do with Harbour distributions, including a latest offical
release ? That's why we need an internal version number.
,-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| > 2) Recently the base workarea structure was changed in xHarbour. You
| > know that every RDD have it's own workarea structure with first
| > fields from a basic and some other, specific for this RDD, after the
| > basic, and this structure is kept in a new header file.
| > Now, if I want to keep the Leto RDD working for both Harbour and
| > xHarbour, it's latest and previous versions, I need to provide two
| > header files and leave a note for users of latest xharbour to rename
| > xrddleto.h to rddleto.h before compiling the RDD.
`-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> And this I'd like to dedicate to you ;-)
:).
[ ... ]
> In summary it seems to be xHarbour only problem and you should ask
> xHarbour developers about it.
Patrick, Ron, Brian, are you hear us :) ?
Regards,
Alexander.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
