On 26/02/2026 22:20, William Lallemand wrote: >> Note that it would be better to change how haproxy does status polling, >> and implements the state machine, but that will take some thought >> and time, this patch is a quick fix of the problem. >> >> See: >> https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/2125 >> https://github.com/letsencrypt/pebble/issues/133 > > Still under my radar but I didn't had time this week to test that.
Hello William, With regards to the above polling rewrite I mentioned, I now more or less understand the code structure, so I will probably submit it sometime next week, so if you still haven't tested this yet you can just not bother with this patch and wait a bit, so you don't waste time.
