Hi Willy! On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 08:54:08AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > That's a good point, however it will not help the users locate the right > tunable either. I think it can be useful to print actconn, which is the > number of active front connections and can definitely give a hint about > a limit that might have been encountered (e.g. if you see 125000, it > instantly rules out any lower threshold). You can log it as "actconn=" > since it's already mentioned in the doc about log formats. >
Do you mean print the actconn in both cases? I understand it for ENFILE, because the actconn, which is almost at the system limits, eliminates all doubts. I suppose that ENOMEM is mostly caused by a large number of opened FDs and printing this number can be useful, but I feel some lack of coherency between actconn and ENOMEM. -- Egor Shestakov egor ascii(0x40) ved1 ascii(0x2E) me
