> Am 07.03.2023 um 18:26 schrieb Marc West <westm...@gmx.com>:
>
> On 2023-03-07 08:09:04, Rainer Duffner wrote:
>> I admit I only toyed with TP, so I really don???t know what I???m doing
>> there, but:
>>
>> Have you tried to just use pfSense for this? The developer of the package
>> (https://github.com/PiBa-NL) seemed to be active here, but I haven???t seen
>> anything from him since 2020, so I wonder if he has moved on.
>>
>> My co-workers use OPNSense for this purpose - and on VMWare, they insist
>> that only em(4) NICs work.
>>
>>
>> If you don???t find his email-address, I can mail it to you.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. I haven't tried HAProxy on pfSense but the
> working transparent config and related ipfw fwd rules we have did come
> from PiBa-NL [1].
Ah, ok.
Either ask on the freebsd-forum or the mailing-list - or try with
OPNSense/pfSense and if the problem persists, you might get more response on
the forums there.
pf and ipfw are very specialized parts of the kernel and very few developers
want to touch it, AFAIK.
> Everything does function perfectly until a brief
> period with production traffic and something happens to cause the tproxy
> bind errors and request failures to start. I'm just not sure what is
> going wrong or how to debug further.
>
> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg09923.html
>
