Hi Willy, On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:34:52AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Unfortunately this one looks different. It dies when it is stopping > (see deinit, unbind*, ...), are you sure it's not the previous process > when you're performing a reload ? Note that it *could* possibly still > be the same, but I find it strange that it only dies on exit and that > surprisingly the process quits with saturated listeners.
Indeed, I realised my description was misleading. I mixed the time when the machine is booting with an older config, and then gets updates which is being reloaded just after. So it's indeed a reload. > With this said, we've got no negative feedback on the patch above after > one month and a half, which likely is a good indication that we should > now backport it (carefully as mentionned in the commit message). let us know if you need some hands for the backport, we may try to propose it. Thanks, -- William
