Hi Cyril,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:18:49AM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> this set of patches is an attempt to make the http-request/http-response
> documentation more readable.
> If it's OK for you, I will do the same work for tcp-request/tcp-response.
Oh that's an excellent idea, thanks for taking care of this! I'm just
wondering if we shouldn't have an "actions" section and have a compatibility
matrix between the keywords and the rule sets, given that some actions are
common between some of them. This would remove some annoying copy-paste.
For example we could have for each keyword something like this :
track-sc <args>
Supported in: tcp-request connection, tcp-request content, http-request
Description:
blah
I don't know what's the best way to do this, but I wanted to suggest it in
case it helps you build up an idea on it.
Regardless of this point, just let me know if you prefer that we first
merge your current patch and that we apply potential extra changes later,
or if you prefer to experiment differently. I'm open to any option.
Thanks!
Willy
