True. This day I spent a lot of time doing a lot of calloc call writing hence that is probably why it caught my eyes in first place :) thanks.
On 3 December 2015 at 10:33, Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:32:34PM +0000, David CARLIER wrote: >> HI all, >> >> there is it is a small patch which fix a wrong calloc call, I think. > > Both are technically equivalent since calloc multiplies the two members, > but you're perfectly right and seeing them reversed is at least confusing. > I know there are a few other remaining ones, I'm the one doing that mistake > from time to time, especially when it's late at night. I renamed you fix to > "CLEANUP" and applied it. > > thanks, > Willy >
