On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:31:46PM -0700, David Birdsong wrote: > > What's the problem exactly ? Is it related to this patch ? > > Yes, this will redraw our entire cache.
Does it mean you have *that* many URLs ending with "/?" ? Because normally it's the only case where it makes a difference. Would you prefer that we add an option such as "hash-empty-query" or something like this ? > I don't think we need a work-around. We're only stuck because our system > expects a level of cache locality that the hash provides. A sudden redraw > would be pretty disastrous, but we're working on removing this cache > locality requirement and we'll be able to upgrade to the latest version. But cache locality is something normal and expected (otherwise hashes would not be used for load balancing). I'm surprized that the specific case where there's a difference makes so much of a difference, that's why I'd like to ensure that 1) the case where this happens is really significant, and 2) we find a solution so that you don't need to change the way your infrastructure works. Regards, Willy
