Hi all
At my wits end with this so hopefully someone with more experience can help Does anyone know why a tape written on a given drive will not be readable on another drive when theyre the same format and being written / read with the same method? Ive written a series of backup tapes (I know this is archaic technology but I want write-once-read-many and I want something non-volatile hence tape). Ive bought 2 drives: one SAS based which is doing the writing and, mindful this is old technology, another SCSI based. The two drives are installed in separate boxes. FWIW the working SAS box is running jammy and the (apparently) working SCSI box is running noble though I suspect this makes little difference. Trouble is: the SCSI drive is flaky / mostly non-working reading only tapes written by the SAS drive. I happen to have some pre-used tapes which were written on a completely different drive (i.e. neither of mine made them) and the SCSI drive can read them fine. Therefore, the SCSI drive, HBA and cable are all fine. For some reason, it just cant read the tapes Ive just written on the SAS box. And yes the SAS drive can read back the tapes it has just written itself. So why would a LTO4 SCSI drive not be able to read from a LTO4 SAS drive when it can read LTO4 tapes written on another machine? FWIW the write command Im using is: tar czvf /dev/nst0 files_to_write For reading, I use: dd if=/dev/nst0 bs=1M | tar xzvf Both The read command works fine on the SAS drive to read its recordings back (so I know the recording has worked) but if I take one such tape (written on the SAS drive) and try to read it using the same command on the SCSI drive no dice all I get is Input / Output error. Things Ive tried: 1. A cleaning tape seemed to go through its paces but no change 2. Testing for it being a tar issue, I tried: dd if=/dev/nst0 bs=1M of=fred.img After a long period of tape activity, I get Input / Output error and fred.img is 0 bytes long. So in short, it looks like both drives are working fine but the SCSI one cant read tapes written on the SAS one but can read tapes written on other drives. FWIW the SCSI drive can read its own tapes. Any constructive advice very welcome. With 20Tb SSDs being so pricey, HDDs being mechanical, Cloud storage for 20Tb being laughably expensive tape is all I can think of for an archive format. And, of course, newer LTO protocols are, again, beyond my price range. I believe were up to LTO9 now but thats ~£2k for the drive itself even if it would mean far fewer tapes. Cheers R
-- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Manage subscription: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire LUG website: http://www.hantslug.org.uk --------------------------------------------------------------
