Quoth Elie Le Vaillant <eolie...@disroot.org>: > In parserange(), we tested wether range was null, to test wether or > not the repeat number was the end of the string (to test if we had > something like "*/3/34"). But it is str that we should be testing, > not range, as its value as a pointer doesn't mean anything in the > current context. > > This makes this cron more in line with other interpretations concerning > '~'. In other crons, a random number is picked for the starting field, > and it doesn't change during all of the program's lifetime, whereas this > one used to change its random number everytime it was matched. > >
I think you forgot the diff in this patch. Regards,
