I did verification of the behavior in the "style" of Oracle: CREATE TABLE test (id int NOT NULL); -- ok
CREATE TABLE "TEST" (id int NOT NULL); -- Error: Table "TEST" already exists; SQL statement: CREATE TABLE "TEST" (id int NOT NULL) [42101-191] It seems to me that such an ambiguous interpretation of the name objects and still is a bug. P.S. Naming double quotes in Oracle is not a standard ANSI SQL :) Most database says that using national or other characters in the naming required to enter the object name in double quotes. But this does not mean a case-sensitive naming the object. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/h2-database. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
