Hi, To improve performance, I added DB_CLOSE_DELAY=-1 to the connection > string, but shown no real benefit.
That's strange, because according to my tests it does improve performance, about the same amount as keeping a connection open (not quite, but close enough). Could you post a test case? My test case: http://h2database.com/p.html#540deb9480ac2b16a445fdaef543ab60 Results (first column is time in millis to open/close 5000 connections): 1555 jdbc:h2:mem:test 192 jdbc:h2:mem:test;db_close_delay=-1 149 jdbc:h2:mem:test using sentinel connection 191 jdbc:h2:mem:test;db_close_delay=-1 using sentinel connection Regards, Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
