Hello all,
I wonder given the current circumstances whether it is worth taking an
approach whereby protections against fully automated decision making is
formalised.
While I would assert the technical benefits from human decisionmaking
from Guix leaders and implementers, I believe the social protections
from humans always being within the chain of progress also advantageous.
This is an example which operates within the EU:
On Thursday, 26 January 2023, the First Chamber of the ECJ held its
hearing in Case C-634/21, the very first in which it has been asked to
interpret Article 22 of the General Data Protection Regulation
('GDPR'). The latter provision grants data subjects the right "not to
be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing,
including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her
or similarly significantly affects him or her".
https://www.europeanlawblog.eu/pub/the-ecjs-first-landmark-case-on-automated-decision-making-a-report-from-the-oral-hearing-before-the-first-chamber
Is this worth others expanding upon this human kernel?
Kind regards,
Jonathan
