Hi, I accept.
Well, I don’t support because, although I can live with, I understand an inconsistency between: > 1. **GenAI use.** Contributors who are *not project members* (as > defined above) MAY use genAI to assist in their authoring process > for some contributions [...] > 3. **Exploratory analysis.** Contributors and project members are free to > use genAI > as part of their exploratory process as long their final contribution > respects the above rules. For instance, use of genAI to identify > the cause of a bug or the reason for a package build failure is > permitted. Well, as a project member, I’m not allowed to use genAI to assist me in my authoring process but I’m allowed to use genAI as part of my exploratory process which is one mean to assist me in my authoring process, no? Since I’m probably the only one who nitpicks here, I can live with my misunderstanding – one among many others in my life. ;-) Last, I accept and I can live with but I don’t support the distinction between Contributors and Project Members because, from my point of view, not using genAI might be seen as “morally superior”. It’s obviously not the intention but it’s how the distinction sounds to me. Cheers, simon
