Greg Hogan <[email protected]> skribis: > Given the confusion over commitments #1 and #2, could we simplify > these to something like: > > "The project will not use nor encourage use of genAI to author code or > packages, to review code, to produce artwork, translations, or any > other artifacts. These prohibitions do not constrain exploratory > analysis, running guix commands, or authoring non-legally significant > contributions. This is to ensure the contributor has a valid copyright > claim on the code. For example, this includes code less than > 15-line-long, or package definitions that are evidently not creative, > similar to those that guix import and similar tools might produce."
OK, sounds good. I find the second sentence ambiguous and would be tempted to summarize it as: Thus rule does not prevent use of genAI for exploratory analysis or to produce non-legally-significant contributions. (“Running guix commands” is fine, whether or not it’s happening via an agent, so I’m not sure what you had in mind.) Ludo’.
