Am Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 04:19:23PM +0200 schrieb pelzflorian (Florian Pelz): > Much of the GCD is worthy of support, but what I believe causes repeated > disagreement is the inclusion of the manual into the GCD rather than the > other way around. > The GCD should only give the mandate to change the manual. > It is still foggy to me what changes of the Guix manual shall follow > this GCD
I agree with this. Thanks for clarifying your ideas on the maintainer team, Gabber, and for changing the wording accordingly. As a minor change, I would suggest to replace - The maintenance team crafts a yearly report of their activity with a proposal of the group they feel fittest for the task. by - The maintenance team crafts a yearly report of their activity with a proposal for the composition of the team during the next year. (it replaces a potential judgement of value by something concrete and operational). I do not think that this state of affairs is what I would like to see as the final outcome for a maintenance team (for which there are several options, including a vote as I mentioned in my recent message, or to completely drop the team, or more). But we are running out of time, and your suggestion is operational, and makes some progress in the sense that there is a way for people to get (more easily) in and out of the maintainers' group. Andreas
